您好,欢迎来到试剂仪器网! [登录] [免费注册]
试剂仪器网
位置:首页 > 产品库 > ADH-1
立即咨询
咨询类型:
     
*姓名:
*电话:
*单位:
Email:
*留言内容:
请详细说明您的需求。
*验证码:
 
ADH-1
本产品不向个人销售,仅用作科学研究,不用于任何人体实验及非科研性质的动物实验。
ADH-1图片
CAS NO:229971-81-7
规格:98%
分子量:570.69
包装与价格:
包装价格(元)
5mg电议
10mg电议
50mg电议
100mg电议

产品介绍
ADH-1是一种N-cadherin的拮抗剂,能够抑制N-cadherin介导的细胞黏附。
CAS:229971-81-7
分子式:C22H34N8O6S2
分子量:570.69
纯度:98%
存储:Store at -20°C

Background:

ADH-1, an N-cadherin antagonist, inhibits N-cadherin mediated cell adhesion.


ADH-1 (0.2 mg/mL) blocks collagen I-mediated changes in pancreatic cancer cells, and is highly effective at preventing cell motility that is induced by expression of N-cadherin. ADH-1 (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/mL) induces apoptosis in a dose-dependent and N-cadherin-dependent manner[1].


ADH-1 (50 mg/kg) significantly prevents tumor growth and metastasis in a mouse model for pancreatic cancer. ADH-1 prevents tumor cell invasion and metastasis in an orthotopic model for pancreatic cancer using N-cadherin overexpressing BxPC-3 cells[1]. ADH-1, at the dosages evaluated, does not display either antiangiogenic activity in a rat aortic ring assay or antitumor potential in a PC3 subcutaneous xenograft tumor model[2]. ADH-1 (10 mL/kg, i.p.) augmentation of melanoma tumor growth is overcome through its ability to make regionally infused melphalan more effective. ADH-1 mediated augmentation of melanoma tumor growth is not altered by regionally infused temozolomide. In A375, but not DM443 xenografts, ADH-1 treatment increases phosphorylation of AKT at serine 473. ADH-1 slightly diminishes N-cadherin expression in both xenografts[3].


[1]. Shintani Y, et al. ADH-1 suppresses N-cadherin-dependent pancreatic cancer progression. Int J Cancer. 2008 Jan 1;122(1):71-7. [2]. Li H, et al. ADH1, an N-cadherin inhibitor, evaluated in preclinical models of angiogenesis and androgen-independent prostate cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 2007 Jun;18(5):563-8. [3]. Turley RS, et al. Targeting N-cadherin increases vascular permeability and differentially activates AKT in melanoma. Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):368-77